blog

California DA Drops DUI Charge in Case Involving Man Who Tested Positive for Caffeine

- Dmitry Gurovich

In late December, a California district attorney announced that a DUI charge had been dropped in a case involving a man who tested positive for caffeine after a traffic stop.

According to court documents, the man was initially pulled over on Interstate 680 after an officer witnessed him weaving through traffic, nearly causing several collisions. The officer believed the driver was under the influence of a drug, but found only workout supplements and powders in the car, all of which were legal.

Upon arriving at the jail, the man consented to a blood test, which returned negative results for several drugs, including THC, cocaine, opiates, oxycodone and methamphetamine. It did, however, test positive for caffeine.

Though the charge was pursued for 16 months, the district attorney elected to drop the case after forensic toxicologists and investigators ruled that the case could not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

DUI Defense

In the state of California, an individual may be charged with driving under the influence (DUI) if they are found with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) that meets or exceeds .08 percent. It does not matter whether or not someone feels impaired – if the BAC exceeds the legal limit, it is classified as DUI.

It’s important to point out, however, that DUI cases are not restricted to the use of alcohol. If someone is pulled over and found to be impaired, at least to an “appreciable degree” by drugs, or a combination of drugs and alcohol, that may result in a DUI charge.

State law in California also says that, if you are operating a vehicle, you are providing your consent to submit to a blood, breath or urine test to determine your BAC. There are consequences for refusing such tests in California. These offenses vary depending on whether or not it is a first, second or third offense:

  • First offense – One year license suspension
  • Second offense – Two year license suspension
  • Third offense – Two year license suspension

Although BAC is technically supposed to be measured at the time of driving, it is possible to prove culpability if BAC is measured after that time. For example, if tests are issued at the police station, those results may be applicable in a court of law.

Are you facing DUI-related charges? If so, it is important that you enlist the guidance of a skilled defense attorney as soon as possible. Because these types of cases can involve the suspension of a driver’s license, or even jail time, it is important to work with an attorney who has experience and success in handling DUI-related charges.

DUI Defense Attorneys in California

That’s where the criminal defense team at Gurovich, Berk and Associates comes in. Our firm specializes in criminal defense, including cases involving DUI and related charges. Our legal team is well versed in the laws surrounding DUI in California and we can provide the wise legal guidance you are looking for as you build your case’s defense.

Whether this is your first or a subsequent offense, our attorneys have the tools, experience and legal knowledge necessary to see your case through to a successful end result. To schedule your free preliminary consultation, contact Gurovich, Berk & Associates at (213) 385-1555.

Lawmaker Gets New Court Date in Domestic Violence, Weapons Case

- Dmitry Gurovich

Last month, a South Carolina judge set new court dates in a case involving Rep. Chris Corley, who stands accused of a number of felony weapons and domestic violence charges.

Corley was charged after a Dec. 26 incident at his family home, where he allegedly beat his wife before pointing a gun at her in the presence of their three small children. In a January court appearance, a circuit court judge set a $50,000 bond against the lawmaker for criminal domestic violence of an aggravated nature.

Corley was also charged with pointing a weapon at a person, a charge that carries up to five years in prison. If he is found guilty on all charges, Corley faces up to 25 years in prison.

Under the terms of the bond, Corley is to have no contact with his children or his wife, unless the court issues an order allowing it. His wife was granted a temporary restraining order in connection with the case.

Domestic Violence Defense

Domestic violence is a catchall phrase that refers to violent acts, or threats of violence, that occur between two individuals of a close, often familial, relationship. This can involve people who are living together, married, or even just dating. In some cases, they may even share a child in common.

The truth is, anyone can become a victim or a perpetrator of domestic violence, regardless of sexual orientation. In some cases, these situations can involve serious injuries, especially in cases where a male has attacked a female. However, many cases also involve lesser acts of violence, such as pushing or slapping. In some situations, domestic violence may extend to children as well.

In many states, domestic violence is defined as a distinct crime. This means that someone can be charged with a form of domestic violence in addition to, or instead of, other crimes, such as assault and battery. Additionally, prosecutors will often push for harsher sentencing in domestic violence cases, supporting more jail time in cases where someone attacks a spouse or family member, rather than a stranger.

Have you been accused of a domestic violence offense? If so, it is important for you to retain experienced legal counsel as soon as possible. Only an attorney who is well versed in your state’s domestic violence laws can protect you and your rights, not just now, but in the future as well. Because these types of cases involve close relationships, they can often become complex, so it is important to find an attorney who can support you every step of the way.

Finding a Domestic Violence Defense Attorney

At Gurovich, Berk and Associates, we believe early intervention by skilled legal counsel is the key to a strong, proper defense. Our legal team is comprised of the finest defense attorneys, including those specializing in complex family law matters, like domestic violence.

Our attorneys will work with you to conduct an in-depth investigation into your domestic violence charges and can recommend the best possible strategy for you and your case.

Regardless of the circumstances surrounding your domestic violence charge, our firm can help. We have become known as a premier legal resource, not just in California, but across the country as well.

Do not delay – these types of charges are not to be taken lightly. Allow us work with you to build a strong, successful defense. To schedule your complimentary initial consultation with a member of our criminal defense team, contact the attorneys at Gurovich, Berk & Associates today at (213) 385-1555.

Intricacies of Assault Charges

- Dmitry Gurovich

It is not uncommon for someone to be charged with assault. An assault is an “attempted application of force.” This distinguishes an assault from its common counterpart: battery. Battery is a different crime and is the actual use of force or violence against someone else. These crimes are frequently confused but it is important to remember that they are different. This means that they require different types of defenses to refute the charges.

Common Situations

It is important for anyone charged with assault to have an attorney that is capable of understanding the intricacies of an assault case. Many times, assault charges actually stem from a non-violent confrontation that is misconstrued to be violent in nature.

Some common situations that give rise to assault allegations:

  • Spousal disputes
  • Arguments with friends
  • Insults and joking threats
  • Children acting out

Evidence as an Issue

In addition to this, the evidence is often tenuous in an assault case and this makes it a common issue for those charged with assault. Many times assaults have no witnesses except for the victim. This means that the cases may come down to what each party is claiming occurred during the alleged. This poses frequent issues for individuals charged with assault.

For example, in domestic violence cases, the male party is most frequently charged with assaults. This occurs if the alleged victim calls the police and claims that the man attempted to assault her. If there was no battery, then when the officer arrives on the scene it can be difficult to determine if an assault actually occurred if there is no evidence. This means that the alleged victim can simply claim that there was an assault and force the individual to go through legal proceedings. It is not uncommon for false allegations to occur, as well as alleged victims to recant their previous testimony after the consider the consequences of their allegations.

Hire an Attorney

This is why it is important to have an attorney that is capable of understanding the complicated nature of assaults. If you or a loved one has been charged with assault in the Los Angeles area, please call (213) 385-1555 to speak with an attorney from Gurovich, Berk & Associates. Our attorneys have successfully represented a number of clients on assault charges because of our experience and understanding of the process.

We are available twenty-four hours a day for a free consultation so that you can being to build the best defense to any allegations of assault.

Recreational Marijuana Bill Could Impact California Drug DUI Laws

- Dmitry Gurovich

With an election around the corner, California is preparing for a vote on Proposition 64 that could significantly impact drug-related DUI cases. Currently, Californians cannot legally possess, transport, or use marijuana for recreational purposes. Proposition 64 seeks to change that by legalizing recreational marijuana.

According to the Proposition, marijuana sales will be taxed at a rate of 15%. A portion of the proceeds from this tax will be used to research the effects of marijuana on driving. The findings from this research may be used in the future to establish guidelines for intoxication levels for people who have been accused of a DUI involving marijuana or drugs, similar to the 0.08 standard for an alcohol-related DUI.

Being Found Guilty of DUI

Under current California law, there are two ways for a person to be found guilty of DUI.

The first way occurs when the prosecutor can show that a person had a blood alcohol content above 0.08. This standard is inapplicable in a drug case because drugs do not affect a person’s blood alcohol content. Proposition 64 could change this. If research takes place, under Proposition 64, it is conceivable that a standard similar to 0.08 could be created for THC levels in the blood from marijuana consumption.

The second form of DUI requires the prosecutor to show that

  • A person drove a vehicle
  • While driving, the person was under the influence of drug(s) or alcohol

According to California Criminal Jury Instruction 2110, the prosecutor has to show that the person was under the influence, which means that a person is no longer able to drive a vehicle in a manner similar to a sober person under the similar circumstances.

Currently, all drug DUI cases, not involving alcohol, must be proven under this second standard. Namely, the prosecutor must show that the person was impaired by drugs to the degree where he could no longer safely operate a motor vehicle. This type of conviction is more difficult for a prosecutor to prove because the prosecutor cannot rely on a set standard, such as a BAC of 0.08.

Fighting DUI Charges

There are multiple ways to fight this standard for DUI drug cases. On the issue of California Jury Instruction 2110 alone, an experienced criminal defense attorney may argue that the defendant used ordinary care while driving or that a sober person would have acted similarly under the circumstances that were presented to the accused. Even in cases where the defendant’s behavior fell well below the standard associated with a sober person, a defense attorney may potentially argue that the person could have driven a vehicle with the caution of a sober person even if the evidence shows that he did not.

There are many nuances to a DUI Drug case. If you are accused of a DUI involving drugs, you would do well to talk to an experienced attorney about your case. To schedule a free consultation with a criminal defense attorney from Gurovich, Berk & Associates, we invite you to call call (213) 385-1555.

Momentary Possession as a Defense to Drug Charges

- Dmitry Gurovich

A former USC and Raider quarterback was recently charged with having methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia in his possession, and other charges. According to reports, he was found in the backyard of a home, which was not his own, trying to dispose of a bag containing meth and marijuana.

Transitory Possession

This case raises an interesting but seldom used defense in drug cases called “transitory possession”. Under this defense, an individual will not be found guilty for possession if he can establish, beyond a preponderance of the evidence, that:

  • For a momentary or transitory time the person had possession of it
  • The defendant was only in control of it while trying to get rid of it
  • The defendant did not intend to obstruct law enforcement from getting it

This defense comes from a case that was decided in the 1970s where the California Supreme Court found that drug possession offenses were not meant to include situations where a person was attempting to dispose of drugs and only held the drugs while disposing of them [see People v. Mijares].

If you believe that this defense is applicable to your case, you should speak with an drug possession attorney experienced in handling drug possession cases. Raising this defense is difficult because it requires an admission to the crime. In stating that you were attempting to get rid of drugs, you admit that you had drugs and that they were, in fact, drugs.

Additionally, this defense is risky because it shifts the burden from the prosecution to the defense. What this means is that the defendant will have to prove that he was trying to dispose of the drugs or else he will be found guilty. Ordinarily, the defendant does not have to prove any portion of a case and is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty by the prosecutor. Because of this burden shift, this defense carries a number of substantial risks. Naturally, this defense should only be attempted by an experienced attorney.

Raising This Defense

The defense of momentary possession is not typically available in all possession in cases. It relies heavily on the details of the case and requires the careful analysis of an experienced defense lawyer before using it.

If you are charged with a Drug offense in California, the defense attorneys at Gurovich, Berk & Associates can provide a free consultation at (213) 385-1555 to help you better understand your options in cases similar to this involving drugs.

Process for Reducing Theft Felony Offenses to Misdemeanors

- Dmitry Gurovich

California’s Proposition 47 which was intended to reduce jail congestion has led to numerous applications for re-sentencing and reclassification of theft crimes and other qualified felonies. The new law is expected to benefit some 10,000 inmates who are currently serving sentences for non-serious and nonviolent crimes.

Theft Offenses Reduced to Misdemeanors

The offenses of Grand Theft and Receiving Stolen Property are now reduced to petty theft misdemeanors, as long as the value of the property taken does not exceed $950. In addition, a new theft misdemeanor of shoplifting has been included in Section 459.5 of the Penal Code. Shoplifting is defined as:

Entering a commercial establishment with the intent to commit larceny, while the establishment is open, and where the value of the property taken does not exceed $950.

Procedures Available for Theft Sentences

The new law provides the following options to persons who have been convicted of theft felonies before the act took effect in 2014:

  • Persons currently serving felony sentences for theft offenses may petition the court for re-sentencing as a misdemeanor
  • Persons who have already served felony sentences may apply for reclassification of their crimes as misdemeanors

Exclusions

As with most laws, not everyone will qualify for misdemeanor re-sentencing or re-classification. The court may deny applications or petitions of persons with prior convictions for designated violent offenses or for a crime which requires registration as a sex offender.

Legal procedure

The recall or re-sentencing, however, is not automatic. The appropriate petition must be filed in court and the petitioner must establish that they satisfy the criteria for re-sentencing or re-classification. Depending on the circumstances of the petitioner, the court may issue an order recalling the first sentence and impose a new one for a misdemeanor.

If you are currently serving prison time for a theft felony under circumstances that would fall under the new definitions for theft misdemeanors, it’s important to speak to an experienced theft attorney about the possibility of re-sentencing. Your attorney should also be able to prepare the appropriate petition, present evidence to the satisfaction of the court, and ultimately obtain a reduced sentence or charge under your circumstances.

In Los Angeles, California, the law firm of Gurovich, Berk & Associates has over 35 years of combined experience handling theft-related charges and achieving positive outcomes. We invite you to call us today at (213) 385-1555 to speak to one of our dedicated attorneys about your situation.

Four Women Exonerated for 1990s Sex Crimes

- Dmitry Gurovich

In 1990, four women were convicted of sexual assaulting two children. They were convicted on the testimony of a doctor who testified that the children’s injuries were the result of satanic ritual common among lesbians. This doctor ultimately recanted her testimony in addition to other witnesses who were presented at trial.

Based on this, the Court of Appeals exonerated the four women and overturned their conviction. The court claimed that the convictions were the result of untruthful claims perpetuated by stigma against lesbians and there was no additional evidence to suggest the women are guilty. As a result of their exoneration, the women will have civil recourse for compensation for the decades that they were incarcerated.

Sex Crimes and Stigma

There is a lot of stigma that surrounds the issue of sex crimes because no one really wants to discuss it, and the allegations generally strike an emotional cord with the community. This means that when allegations of a sex crime occur, the police and prosecutors may try to charge the first suspect that they find. As police officers and prosecutors and juries are all human, they are all susceptible to feelings of avenging the victims and punishing perpetrators. That means that they frequently connect sex crimes and alternative lifestyles.

For example, the four exonerated women were convicted because the police and community wanted to ensure that they incarcerated the actual perpetrator. Unfortunately, they fell victim to social stigma against lesbians and allowed that to influence their decision to falsely testify, charge, and convict them.

Some other common examples include:

  • Race
  • Gender
  • Sexuality
  • Disability
  • Age
  • Social Economic Status

Defenses to Sex Crimes

It is not uncommon for someone to be falsely accused of a sex crime. This frequently happens with child sex allegations. Sometimes adults around children give unintentional hints to a child to allege sex abuse. If a child is an actual victim, a parent or other authority figure may pressure them into claiming it was the defendant when they really didn’t know the identity of the perpetrator at all. This can happen both intentionally and unintentionally. It can also happen with doctors interviewing the child, family members, or teachers.

If you have been charged with a sex crime in the Los Angeles area, you should immediately contact Gurovich, Berk & Associates at (213) 385-1555. Our sex crime attorneys are available 24/7 to provide a free consultation. It is important to provide your best defense in order to avoid the criminal results of a felony.

All-American Football Star Charged with Theft

- Dmitry Gurovich

A former cornerback for the University of Oregon Duck’s has been arrested for theft, possession of a controlled substance and paraphernalia, and violation of his probation. The football player had been previously arrested for driving on a suspended license and arson charges.

His mother claims that her son suffers from CTE, a chronic brain disease that develops after individuals are repeatedly suffer trauma to the head. Football players are notorious for suffering from this brain disease which can cause, among other things, impulsive behavior, substance abuse, memory loss and depression.

While he has a long road ahead, the accused is lucky to have his families support to advocate on his behalf.

Why Does Theft Occur?

There are many different types of theft charges that range from misdemeanors to felonies. Depending on the situation, one person may be charged with multiple counts of theft. This frequently occurs when someone is charged with identify theft of multiple different people. Sometimes allegations of theft are false, but sometimes the individual has stolen for another, mitigating reason.

Some of these reasons may include:

  • Out of necessity in a marital or divorce dispute
  • Out of hunger or need resulting from poverty
  • As rebellious childhood behavior

These mitigating circumstances can be used to the benefit of the person charged with theft if they are attempting to negotiate a deal with the prosecutor to have the charges dismissed.

Penalties for Theft

The penalties for theft can vary dramatically depending on a number of factors. These include whether theft is charged in multiple counts or alongside other crimes. This will increase the penalty if convicted. Additionally, it depends if it is being charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. In many states, this distinction is based on the monetary value of the items stolen and can significantly determine the sentence. Since the penalties can be severe, it is important that anyone charged with theft hires an attorney that is capable of defending them on these charges.

If you or a loved one has been charged with theft, we invite your to contact Gurovich, Berk & Associates at (213) 385-1555. We are located in Los Angeles but have experience working theft cases all around the United States. Our theft attorneys are available to provide you a free consultation so that you can have a better understanding of your case and being to build a defense to the charges of theft.

No Gun Crime Charges for North Carolina Police Officer

- Dmitry Gurovich

Despite the controversy surrounding the case, a court in North Carolina decided not to charge a police officer for a criminal offense in the death of Keith Lamont Scott. Mr. Scott’s family claimed that he was reading a book in his car when the police decided to engage with him. Dashboard camera videos show that he was inside of his vehicle when the officers began to yell at him. He was then seen walking backwards without a gun in his hand. While we have not been shown the moment of the shooting, ultimately the officer fired four shots into Mr. Scott’s back. The government and police claimed that Mr. Scott was smoking marijuana and yielded a handgun when he emerged from the vehicle. They further allege that Mr. Scott was not responding to any commands from the police officers to drop his weapon.

Gun Crime Enhancements

Many times there are enhancements in charges and sentencing for gun crimes because of the nature of the harm that guns can cause. Sometimes, gun crimes can add additional decades onto sentences that would be far shorter had they been without the enhancement. This is controversial because it means that possession of a gun during a crime can enhance a sentence even if there was no intention of using it.

Some common crimes that are charged simultaneously with gun crimes:

  • Assaults
  • Batteries
  • Sex Crimes
  • Drug Crimes
  • Traffic Offenses
  • Theft and Robberies

Arguing Self-Defense

Self-defense is a common claim that arises as the result of gun crime allegations. The situation with the officer and Mr. Scott above illustrates the fact that self-defense is frequently a successful avenue to pursue to refute gun charges. In a self-defense claim, the defendant is essentially arguing that they had no option but to commit the crime that they committed because they were in imminent danger. This may refute charges of murder, brandishing or an assault charge with enhancements.

For these reasons, it is important to hire an attorney who is capable of providing a compelling defense in court. Gurovich, Berk and Associates are criminal defense lawyers in Los Angeles that have experience providing successful defenses to gun crimes.

If you have been charged with any crime please contact us at (213) 385-1555 for a free consultation our attorneys are available 24/7 to evaluate your case and potential avenues to resolve the case. If it goes to trial, we also have experience providing a compelling argument in the courtroom.

Self-Inflicted Injury as Domestic Violence Defense

- Dmitry Gurovich

A former California Highway Patrolman was recently acquitted after jury considered his domestic violence defense that his wife caused her own injuries during an altercation. The case stemmed from a reported incident of an alleged altercation in the parties’ home. The defendant was later charged with felony domestic violence cases.

Defendant’s Testimony

During the trial, the defendant testified that he and his wife had an argument on the day of the reported incident but that he did not choke her or intentionally inflict physical injuries upon her, contrary to statements made by their son. Sometime during the trial, the defendant revealed that their son was not his biological son and that he could only surmise that the young man lied about the alleged abuse because of his mom.

The defendant also said that any wounds that his wife may have suffered during the scuffle were in self defense because the woman was allegedly shoving the defendant at the time.

His wife and her supposed two witnesses refused to testify even after the judge ordered them to answer questions in court. All three were cited in contempt for failing to obey the judge’s order to answer.

Jury Acquittal

Without the testimony of the alleged victim and her eyewitnesses, the jury dismissed the domestic violence charges against the defendant, except for one as the result of their failing to reach a consensus.

Domestic Violence Defenses

The California Penal Code defines domestic violence as the intentional or reckless inflicting of a bodily injury, an attempt to cause physical harm, or a threat to cause another physical harm or injury.

Relationship between the alleged perpetrator and the victim is crucial for the complained behavior to fall under domestic violence. In other words, it is important to establish that the alleged victim is either a:

  • Spouse or former spouse
  • Girlfriend or former girlfriend
  • Someone the defendant is dating or has dated,
  • Cohabitant or a person who is living with or has lived with the defendant.

Relationships go through challenging times when arguments or disagreements can arise. But not all marital or relationship arguments constitute domestic violence. If you are charged with domestic violence, you must speak to an experienced criminal defense attorney before making any admissions or statements regarding the incident.

Your attorney can examine the charges against you and exhaust any legal remedies that are available in your situation, including raising the appropriate domestic violence defenses in your favor.

In California, the law firm of Gurovich, Berk & Associates have extensive experience in domestic violence cases, having obtained favorable outcomes in numerous situations involving clients.

If you are being accused or have been charged with domestic violence, we urge you to call us immediately at (213) 385-1555 to speak to one of our dedicated attorneys about your case.